GLCNF
Price
$3.81
Change
-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
45.46B
54 days until earnings call
WRSLF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
29.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLCNF vs WRSLF

Header iconGLCNF vs WRSLF Comparison
Open Charts GLCNF vs WRSLFBanner chart's image
Glencore
Price$3.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Volume$289.66K
Capitalization45.46B
Winsome Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization29.54M
GLCNF vs WRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLCNF vs. WRSLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCNF is a Hold and WRSLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLCNF: $3.81 vs. WRSLF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: GLCNF and WRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLCNF: 15% vs. WRSLF: 7%
Market capitalization -- GLCNF: $45.46B vs. WRSLF: $29.54M
GLCNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $45.46B. WRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $29.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLCNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLCNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WRSLF is a better buy in the long-term than GLCNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLCNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRSLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLCNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WRSLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLCNF is a better buy in the short-term than WRSLF.

Price Growth

GLCNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.11% price change this week, while WRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLCNF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLCNF($45.5B) has a higher market cap than WRSLF($29.5M). GLCNF YTD gains are higher at: -11.180 vs. WRSLF (-54.972). GLCNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.13B vs. WRSLF (-17.67M).
GLCNFWRSLFGLCNF / WRSLF
Capitalization45.5B29.5M154,237%
EBITDA8.13B-17.67M-46,011%
Gain YTD-11.180-54.97220%
P/E Ratio14.75N/A-
Revenue231BN/A-
Total Cash1.42BN/A-
Total Debt38.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLCNF: Fundamental Ratings
GLCNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLCNFWRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLCNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KPELF6.25N/A
N/A
Keppel Corporation Limited
NPSKF4.50N/A
N/A
NSK Ltd.
JWCTF0.66N/A
N/A
JW CAYMAN THERAPEUTICS CO LTD.
FCUL0.08N/A
N/A
Food Culture Inc.
RSRV175.00N/A
N/A
Reserve Petroleum Company (The)

GLCNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLCNF has been closely correlated with BDNNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLCNF jumps, then BDNNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLCNF
1D Price
Change %
GLCNF100%
-0.13%
BDNNY - GLCNF
67%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
RIO - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
BHP - GLCNF
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
TECK - GLCNF
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
IVPAF - GLCNF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
More

WRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRSLF and EMX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRSLF and EMX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRSLF
1D Price
Change %
WRSLF100%
-12.47%
EMX - WRSLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
GLCNF - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
ERDCF - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
CTTZF - WRSLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
WRN - WRSLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More