Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCUX vs RGACX
GLCUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GLCUX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$36.38
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
GLCUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCUX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCUX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. GLCUX (1.53B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: RGACX (0.07) vs GLCUX (0.06). GLCUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GLCUX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than GLCUX (0.58). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: RGACX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.05 vs. GLCUX (16.48). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.21 vs. GLCUX (-7.49).
| GLCUX | RGACX | GLCUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.94 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.94 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.185 | 12.238 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.07 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.48 | 21.05 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.81 | 43.84 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.49 | 40.21 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.53 | 80.13 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement