Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCUX vs RGAHX
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCUX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$38.92
Change-$0.23 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.52
Change-$0.56 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCUX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. GLCUX (1.63B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: RGAHX (0.45) vs GLCUX (0.05). GLCUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCUX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GLCUX (0.58) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.26 vs. GLCUX (12.54). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.58 vs. GLCUX (-3.91).
| GLCUX | RGAHX | GLCUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.44 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.44 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.283 | 19.172 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.45 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.54 | 15.26 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 75.27 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.91 | 43.58 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement