GLDG
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
161.01M
5 days until earnings call
HL
Price
$6.07
Change
+$0.04 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLDG vs HL

Header iconGLDG vs HL Comparison
Open Charts GLDG vs HLBanner chart's image
GoldMining
Price$0.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$138.96K
Capitalization161.01M
Hecla Mining
Price$6.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.66%)
Volume$9.15M
Capitalization3.01B
GLDG vs HL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDG vs. HL commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDG is a StrongBuy and HL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDG: $0.73 vs. HL: $6.07)
Brand notoriety: GLDG: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDG: 28% vs. HL: 43%
Market capitalization -- GLDG: $161.01M vs. HL: $3.01B
GLDG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $161.01M. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than GLDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLDG is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

GLDG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.28% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLDG is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than GLDG($161M). HL has higher P/E ratio than GLDG: HL (1111.11) vs GLDG (1.77). HL YTD gains are higher at: 23.803 vs. GLDG (-9.565). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. GLDG (-20.11M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. GLDG (20.8M). GLDG has less debt than HL: GLDG (456K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than GLDG: HL (720M) vs GLDG (0).
GLDGHLGLDG / HL
Capitalization161M3.01B5%
EBITDA-20.11M124M-16%
Gain YTD-9.56523.803-40%
P/E Ratio1.771111.110%
Revenue0720M-
Total Cash20.8M106M20%
Total Debt456K663M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLDG vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
GLDG
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
366
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
9485
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8993
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLDG's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (51) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (94) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (80) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

GLDG's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDGHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWCCX43.490.53
+1.23%
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG C
HSLFX42.780.49
+1.16%
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
FGGGX43.000.07
+0.16%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc529-F-2
AIECX19.740.02
+0.10%
Invesco EQV International Equity C
HRLYX9.34-0.01
-0.11%
Hartford Real Asset Y

GLDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDG
1D Price
Change %
GLDG100%
+0.68%
PAAS - GLDG
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HL - GLDG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
ARMN - GLDG
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
AG - GLDG
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
CGAU - GLDG
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with FSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then FSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
+0.66%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
MAG - HL
77%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
EXK - HL
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
PAAS - HL
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More