GLDG
Price
$1.10
Change
+$0.04 (+3.77%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
212.09M
34 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$34.60
Change
+$1.02 (+3.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.66B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLDG vs PAAS

Header iconGLDG vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts GLDG vs PAASBanner chart's image
GoldMining
Price$1.10
Change+$0.04 (+3.77%)
Volume$1.55M
Capitalization212.09M
Pan American Silver
Price$34.60
Change+$1.02 (+3.04%)
Volume$6.51M
Capitalization14.66B
GLDG vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDG vs. PAAS commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDG is a StrongBuy and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDG: $1.10 vs. PAAS: $34.60)
Brand notoriety: GLDG: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDG: 202% vs. PAAS: 129%
Market capitalization -- GLDG: $212.09M vs. PAAS: $14.66B
GLDG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $212.09M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLDG and PAAS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLDG is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

GLDG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +18.59% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLDG is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($14.7B) has a higher market cap than GLDG($212M). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 73.238 vs. GLDG (36.646). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. GLDG (-26.81M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 900M vs. GLDG (6.02M). GLDG has less debt than PAAS: GLDG (344K) vs PAAS (804M). PAAS has higher revenues than GLDG: PAAS (3.12B) vs GLDG (0).
GLDGPAASGLDG / PAAS
Capitalization212M14.7B1%
EBITDA-26.81M1.41B-2%
Gain YTD36.64673.23850%
P/E RatioN/A23.86-
Revenue03.12B-
Total Cash6.02M900M1%
Total Debt344K804M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLDG vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
GLDG
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2678
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
9585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (46) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (95) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (39) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

GLDG's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (98) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDGPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGNG33.890.24
+0.71%
Global X Aging Population ETF
RFV131.330.58
+0.45%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
VTWG226.760.95
+0.42%
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
KFEB26.370.10
+0.38%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Feb
SPMV48.93N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF

GLDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been loosely correlated with ARMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then ARMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDG
1D Price
Change %
GLDG100%
+3.77%
ARMN - GLDG
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
AGI - GLDG
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
EGO - GLDG
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.69%
DRD - GLDG
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
PAAS - GLDG
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
More