Ad is loading...
GLERX vs SMFPX
GLERX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLERX vs. SMFPX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLERX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. GLERX (455M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than GLERX: SMFPX (3.64) vs GLERX (2.68). GLERX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLERX (8 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GLERX (1.79). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GLERX (43.00). GLERX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: GLERX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.63 vs. GLERX (11.98). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 149.01 vs. GLERX (131.18).
| GLERX | SMFPX | GLERX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 2.12 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.15 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.147 | -1.124 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 455M | 1.23B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 3.64 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.98 | 18.63 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.50 | 55.77 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 131.18 | 149.01 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers