Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLERX vs SMFPX
GLERX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLERX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLERX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. GLERX (441M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than GLERX: SMFPX (3.55) vs GLERX (2.63). GLERX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLERX (8 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GLERX (1.79). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GLERX (43.00). GLERX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: GLERX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. GLERX (-9.10). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 142.73 vs. GLERX (121.33).
| GLERX | SMFPX | GLERX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 2.12 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.15 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.869 | 3.154 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 1.23B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 3.55 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.10 | 0.71 | -1,290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.16 | 52.05 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.33 | 142.73 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.65 | - |