Ad is loading...
GLERX vs SMFPX
GLERX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLERX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLERX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. GLERX (447M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than GLERX: SMFPX (3.38) vs GLERX (2.53). GLERX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLERX (8 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than GLERX (1.78). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GLERX (43.00). GLERX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: GLERX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.27 vs. GLERX (16.89). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 170.32 vs. GLERX (157.34).
| GLERX | SMFPX | GLERX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 2.13 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 2.13 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.295 | -2.596 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 1.22B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.38 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.89 | 22.27 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.76 | 42.17 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.34 | 170.32 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...