Ad is loading...
GLERX vs SMFPX
GLERX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLERX vs. SMFPX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLERX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. GLERX (479M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than GLERX: SMFPX (4.75) vs GLERX (3.21). GLERX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLERX (7 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. GLERX (41.00). GLERX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: GLERX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.10 vs. GLERX (27.52). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 117.34 vs. GLERX (106.04).
| GLERX | SMFPX | GLERX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.937 | 5.056 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 1.32B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 4.75 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.52 | 38.10 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.91 | 69.92 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.04 | 117.34 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...