Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLLAX vs RNWBX
GLLAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GLLAX vs RNWBX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$13.34
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.82M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.55
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
GLLAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLLAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLLAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. GLLAX (156M). GLLAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GLLAX (0.28) vs RNWBX (0.13). GLLAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GLLAX (25 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GLLAX (1.72) and RNWBX (1.67) have similar cost to investors . RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GLLAX (35.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLLAX: RNWBX (250) vs GLLAX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.47 vs. GLLAX (1.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.87 vs. GLLAX (3.58).
| GLLAX | RNWBX | GLLAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.67 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.637 | 14.956 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.13 | 217% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 7.47 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.56 | 37.59 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.58 | 22.87 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.15 | 59.35 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement