Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLLCX vs RNWBX
GLLCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GLLCX vs RNWBX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$11.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.64M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
GLLCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLLCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLLCX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. GLLCX (157M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than GLLCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs GLLCX (0.00). GLLCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GLLCX (24 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). GLLCX (2.47) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GLLCX (35.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLLCX: RNWBX (250) vs GLLCX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. GLLCX (4.69). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. GLLCX (0.10).
| GLLCX | RNWBX | GLLCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.67 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.47 | 1.67 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.882 | 15.935 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 10.50 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.74 | 37.23 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.10 | 27.64 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.44 | 63.65 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement