Ad is loading...
GLLCX vs RNWHX
GLLCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GLLCX vs RNWHX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$10.90
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.43M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$82.68
Change+$0.26 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.23B
GLLCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLLCX vs. RNWHX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLLCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 65.2B vs. GLLCX (149M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GLLCX: RNWHX (1.10) vs GLLCX (0.00). GLLCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GLLCX (24 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). GLLCX (2.47) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GLLCX (35.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLLCX: RNWHX (250) vs GLLCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. GLLCX (0.65). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.76 vs. GLLCX (1.97).
| GLLCX | RNWHX | GLLCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.72 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.47 | 0.72 | 343% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.531 | 8.761 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 65.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.65 | 5.64 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.34 | 27.22 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.97 | 44.76 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers