Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLLCX vs RNWHX
GLLCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GLLCX vs RNWHX
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China C
Price$11.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.64M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.56
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
GLLCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLLCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLLCX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. GLLCX (157M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GLLCX: RNWHX (0.99) vs GLLCX (0.00). GLLCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GLLCX (24 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GLLCX (2.47) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GLLCX (35.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLLCX: RNWHX (250) vs GLLCX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. GLLCX (4.69). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. GLLCX (0.10).
| GLLCX | RNWHX | GLLCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.72 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.47 | 0.72 | 343% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.882 | 16.496 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 11.66 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.74 | 40.00 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.10 | 32.51 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement