Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs RSLBX
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.34
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.28M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.59
Change+$0.23 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.11B
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. GLNAX (71.3M). GLNAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: GLNAX (0.32) vs RSLBX (0.06). GLNAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNAX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNAX (1.81) and RSLBX (1.75) have similar cost to investors . GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. GLNAX (12.08). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.46 vs. RSLBX (8.15).
| GLNAX | RSLBX | GLNAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.75 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.75 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.382 | 8.059 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.3M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.06 | 547% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.08 | 14.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.91 | 20.53 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.46 | 8.15 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.95 | 33.08 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement