Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs RSLBX
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.48
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.09M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.74
Change+$0.64 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32B
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. GLNAX (71.1M). GLNAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: GLNAX (0.31) vs RSLBX (0.06). GLNAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNAX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNAX (1.81) and RSLBX (1.75) have similar cost to investors . GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. GLNAX (5.77). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.69 vs. RSLBX (3.93).
| GLNAX | RSLBX | GLNAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.75 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.75 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.833 | 11.831 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.1M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.06 | 555% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.77 | 8.45 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.01 | 41.41 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.69 | 3.93 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.37 | 47.49 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement