Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs RSLBX
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$23.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.97M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.25
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. GLNAX (68M). GLNAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: GLNAX (0.32) vs RSLBX (0.06). GLNAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNAX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNAX (1.81) and RSLBX (1.75) have similar cost to investors . GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. GLNAX (2.00). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.25 vs. RSLBX (-3.53).
| GLNAX | RSLBX | GLNAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.75 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.75 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.323 | 7.463 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68M | 78.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.06 | 571% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.00 | 5.21 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.17 | 26.61 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.25 | -3.53 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.37 | 40.43 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement