Ad is loading...
GLNAX vs RSLBX
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$21.45
Change+$0.16 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$51.77
Change+$0.48 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.08B
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 66.1B vs. GLNAX (66.9M). GLNAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: GLNAX (0.35) vs RSLBX (0.02). GLNAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNAX (13 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNAX (1.81) and RSLBX (1.75) have similar cost to investors . GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). GLNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.10 vs. RSLBX (-4.68). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.28 vs. RSLBX (17.86).
| GLNAX | RSLBX | GLNAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.75 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.75 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.248 | -9.207 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.9M | 66.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.02 | 1,726% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | -4.68 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.24 | -6.32 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.28 | 17.86 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.64 | 13.33 | 327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...