Ad is loading...
GLNAX vs SCWFX
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$22.88
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.86M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$68.58
Change+$0.15 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.55B
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. GLNAX (74.9M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SCWFX (0.58) vs GLNAX (0.00). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNAX (13 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). GLNAX (29.00) and SCWFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: SCWFX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.92 vs. GLNAX (7.79). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.73 vs. GLNAX (11.72).
| GLNAX | SCWFX | GLNAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.203 | 3.455 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 8.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.77 | 0.70 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.72 | 17.73 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.79 | 53.33 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers