Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSEBX
GLNBX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.78
Change+$0.11 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.09M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.87
Change+$0.73 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32B
GLNBX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. GLNBX (71.1M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSEBX (0.23) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.77 vs. GLNBX (4.99). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 6.96 vs. GLNBX (3.78).
| GLNBX | RSEBX | GLNBX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.224 | 12.096 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.1M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.99 | 8.77 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.80 | 42.67 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.78 | 6.96 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.80 | 57.25 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement