Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSEBX
GLNBX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$20.76
Change+$0.05 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.97M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$70.04
Change+$0.12 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
GLNBX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. GLNBX (68M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSEBX (0.22) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.52 vs. GLNBX (1.27). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : -0.72 vs. GLNBX (-3.31).
| GLNBX | RSEBX | GLNBX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.637 | 7.743 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68M | 78.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.27 | 5.52 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.36 | 27.73 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.31 | -0.72 | 462% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.37 | 49.67 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement