Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSEBX
GLNBX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$22.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.87M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.01
Change+$0.16 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
GLNBX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. GLNBX (72.9M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSEBX (0.23) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. GLNBX (7.30). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.11 vs. GLNBX (11.28).
| GLNBX | RSEBX | GLNBX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.895 | 12.311 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.9M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 9.91 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.27 | 36.06 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.28 | 14.11 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.35 | 54.67 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers