Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSLFX
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSLFX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$20.71
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.27M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.62
Change-$0.40 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSLFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNBX (68.3M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSLFX (0.82) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLFX (32.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSLFX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.74 vs. GLNBX (1.07). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.93 vs. GLNBX (-3.31).
| GLNBX | RSLFX | GLNBX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.70 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.70 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.385 | 8.272 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.07 | 6.74 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.06 | 30.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.31 | 3.93 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.02 | 62.49 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers