Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSLFX
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSLFX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.48M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.90
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSLFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNBX (71.5M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSLFX (0.86) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLFX (32.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSLFX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.95 vs. GLNBX (9.67). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.09 vs. GLNBX (9.56).
| GLNBX | RSLFX | GLNBX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.70 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.70 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.173 | 8.667 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.5M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.86 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 12.95 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.34 | 25.92 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.56 | 16.09 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.82 | 55.76 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement