Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSLFX
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSLFX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$22.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.87M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$79.90
Change+$0.17 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. GLNBX (72.9M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSLFX (0.83) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLFX (32.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSLFX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. GLNBX (7.30). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.10 vs. GLNBX (11.28).
| GLNBX | RSLFX | GLNBX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.70 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.70 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.895 | 12.907 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.9M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 10.73 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.27 | 38.80 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.28 | 19.10 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.35 | 68.15 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers