Ad is loading...
GLNBX vs RSLFX
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSLFX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$19.43
Change+$0.16 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.71M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$65.71
Change+$0.75 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.16B
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSLFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 67.2B vs. GLNBX (67.7M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSLFX (0.95) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: GLNBX (13 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLFX (32.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSLFX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). GLNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.31 vs. RSLFX (-4.48). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.95 vs. GLNBX (22.74).
| GLNBX | RSLFX | GLNBX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.70 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.70 | 366% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.873 | -8.236 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.7M | 67.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | -4.48 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.26 | -0.18 | -707% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.74 | 26.95 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.76 | 30.70 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...