Ad is loading...
GLNBX vs SCWCX
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SCWCX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$19.12
Change-$0.59 (-2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World C
Price$49.45
Change-$2.35 (-4.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SCWCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and SCWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. GLNBX (69.9M). GLNBX (0.00) and SCWCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GLNBX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: GLNBX (13 years) vs SCWCX (24 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SCWCX (1.78). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SCWCX (32.00). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: SCWCX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). GLNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.65 vs. SCWCX (-5.78). GLNBX (42.93) and SCWCX (42.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNBX | SCWCX | GLNBX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.78 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.78 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.655 | -5.250 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.65 | -5.78 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.00 | -8.16 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.93 | 42.08 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.28 | 18.02 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...