Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs SCWCX
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SCWCX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.48M
American Funds SMALLCAP World C
Price$59.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SCWCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and SCWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNBX (71.5M). SCWCX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SCWCX (0.04) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: GLNBX (14 years) vs SCWCX (24 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SCWCX (1.78). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SCWCX (32.00). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: SCWCX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). SCWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. GLNBX (9.67). GLNBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.56 vs. SCWCX (7.41).
| GLNBX | SCWCX | GLNBX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.78 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.78 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.173 | 7.964 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.5M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 11.75 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.34 | 22.24 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.56 | 7.41 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.82 | 32.22 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement