Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs SCWCX
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SCWCX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$20.71
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.27M
American Funds SMALLCAP World C
Price$58.61
Change-$0.31 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SCWCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and SCWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. GLNBX (68.3M). SCWCX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SCWCX (0.04) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: GLNBX (14 years) vs SCWCX (25 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SCWCX (1.78). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SCWCX (32.00). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: SCWCX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). SCWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. GLNBX (1.07). GLNBX return over 5 years is better than : -3.31 vs. SCWCX (-3.84).
| GLNBX | SCWCX | GLNBX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.78 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.78 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.385 | 7.250 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 78.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.07 | 5.61 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.06 | 26.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.31 | -3.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.02 | 37.95 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement