Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs SCWCX
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SCWCX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$22.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.87M
American Funds SMALLCAP World C
Price$61.23
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
GLNBX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SCWCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and SCWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. GLNBX (72.9M). SCWCX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SCWCX (0.04) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: GLNBX (14 years) vs SCWCX (25 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SCWCX (1.78). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SCWCX (32.00). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: SCWCX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). SCWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. GLNBX (7.30). GLNBX return over 5 years is better than : 11.28 vs. SCWCX (10.23).
| GLNBX | SCWCX | GLNBX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.78 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.78 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.895 | 12.045 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.9M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 9.54 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.27 | 34.72 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.28 | 10.23 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.35 | 42.78 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers