Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLAX
GLNCX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLAX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$22.16
Change-$0.13 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.33M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
Price$63.28
Change-$0.49 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.39B
GLNCX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a StrongBuy and RSLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. GLNCX (72.3M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLAX (0.11) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLAX (23 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLAX (1.74). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLAX (32.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLAX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.72 vs. GLNCX (8.20). RSLAX (13.50) and GLNCX (13.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNCX | RSLAX | GLNCX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.74 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.694 | 11.414 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.3M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 10.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 31.73 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.18 | 13.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.75 | 44.18 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement