Ad is loading...
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$20.10
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.74M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$57.73
Change+$0.25 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.12B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 75.1B vs. GLNCX (73.7M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.15) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (13 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNCX (29.00) and RSLBX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. GLNCX (6.12). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 8.17 vs. GLNCX (4.42).
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.310 | 1.245 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.7M | 75.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | 7.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.87 | -6.67 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.42 | 8.17 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.33 | 38.45 | 128% |