Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.51
Change+$0.24 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.68M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$60.64
Change+$0.78 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.91B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 76.9B vs. GLNCX (74.7M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.02) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). GLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.36 vs. RSLBX (8.53). GLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.83 vs. RSLBX (16.89).
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.208 | 6.392 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.7M | 76.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.36 | 8.53 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.38 | 26.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.83 | 16.89 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.85 | 30.27 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers