Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.65M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$60.33
Change-$0.50 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.39B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 78.4B vs. GLNCX (74.6M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.06) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). GLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.73 vs. RSLBX (6.33). GLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.65 vs. RSLBX (8.52).
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.863 | 5.849 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.6M | 78.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.73 | 6.33 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 21.11 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.65 | 8.52 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.53 | 29.77 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers