Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.93
Change-$0.18 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.85M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.81
Change-$0.45 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.34B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. GLNCX (72.9M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.06) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. GLNCX (5.94). GLNCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.89 vs. RSLBX (7.89).
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.442 | 10.200 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.9M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 6.92 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.45 | 27.39 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.89 | 7.89 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.90 | 42.47 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement