Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$20.71
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.27M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.15
Change-$0.31 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNCX (68.3M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.06) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. GLNCX (1.07). RSLBX (-3.24) and GLNCX (-3.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.385 | 7.287 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.07 | 5.64 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.06 | 26.40 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.31 | -3.24 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.12 | 40.20 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers