Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$22.16
Change-$0.13 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.33M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.51
Change-$0.49 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.39B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a StrongBuy and RSLBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. GLNCX (72.3M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.06) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.71 vs. GLNCX (8.20). RSLBX (13.47) and GLNCX (13.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.694 | 11.428 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.3M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 10.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 31.72 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.18 | 13.47 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.75 | 44.29 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement