Ad is loading...
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$19.71
Change+$0.15 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.33M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$54.03
Change+$0.69 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.86B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Buy and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 68.9B vs. GLNCX (69.3M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.02) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (13 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). GLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.35 vs. RSLBX (-5.26). GLNCX (43.03) and RSLBX (42.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.655 | -5.244 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.3M | 68.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.35 | -5.26 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.33 | -7.07 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.03 | 42.96 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.59 | 20.84 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers