Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLDX
GLNCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLDX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$20.71
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.27M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$73.64
Change-$0.38 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
GLNCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNCX (68.3M). RSLDX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLDX (0.78) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLDX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. GLNCX (1.07). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : 3.12 vs. GLNCX (-3.31).
| GLNCX | RSLDX | GLNCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.80 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.80 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.385 | 8.186 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.78 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.07 | 6.65 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.06 | 29.81 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.31 | 3.12 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.12 | 59.21 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement