GLNCY
Price
$7.65
Change
-$0.03 (-0.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
45.46B
54 days until earnings call
LYSCF
Price
$9.62
Change
+$0.21 (+2.23%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
9.32B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNCY vs LYSCF

Header iconGLNCY vs LYSCF Comparison
Open Charts GLNCY vs LYSCFBanner chart's image
Glencore
Price$7.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.39%)
Volume$338.56K
Capitalization45.46B
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$9.62
Change+$0.21 (+2.23%)
Volume$62.59K
Capitalization9.32B
GLNCY vs LYSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNCY vs. LYSCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCY is a StrongBuy and LYSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNCY: $7.65 vs. LYSCF: $9.37)
Brand notoriety: GLNCY and LYSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNCY: 54% vs. LYSCF: 48%
Market capitalization -- GLNCY: $45.46B vs. LYSCF: $9.32B
GLNCY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $45.46B. LYSCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LYSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYSCF is a better buy in the long-term than GLNCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LYSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLNCY is a better buy in the short-term than LYSCF.

Price Growth

GLNCY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.16% price change this week, while LYSCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLNCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

LYSCF is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLNCY($45.5B) has a higher market cap than LYSCF($9.32B). LYSCF has higher P/E ratio than GLNCY: LYSCF (1684.50) vs GLNCY (14.59). LYSCF YTD gains are higher at: 133.666 vs. GLNCY (-9.890). GLNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.13B vs. LYSCF (101M). GLNCY has higher revenues than LYSCF: GLNCY (231B) vs LYSCF (482M).
GLNCYLYSCFGLNCY / LYSCF
Capitalization45.5B9.32B488%
EBITDA8.13B101M8,051%
Gain YTD-9.890133.666-7%
P/E Ratio14.591684.501%
Revenue231B482M47,925%
Total Cash1.42BN/A-
Total Debt38.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLNCY vs LYSCF: Fundamental Ratings
GLNCY
LYSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6029
SMR RATING
1..100
10086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
621
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLNCY's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSCF (98). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew similarly to LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (60). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (100). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLNCY (76). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLNCY (62). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNCYLYSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMUN49.990.25
+0.50%
Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
FDCF48.070.22
+0.45%
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
FALN27.400.07
+0.26%
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
ICLO25.630.03
+0.12%
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
SHEH51.68-0.77
-1.46%
SHELL PLC ADRHEDGED SHEH

GLNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNCY has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLNCY jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNCY
1D Price
Change %
GLNCY100%
-0.39%
RIO - GLNCY
75%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
BHP - GLNCY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
BDNNY - GLNCY
72%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
TECK - GLNCY
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
IVPAF - GLNCY
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
More