Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNIX vs RSEBX
GLNIX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNIX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$24.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.07M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$69.58
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.69B
GLNIX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNIX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNIX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 77.7B vs. GLNIX (75.1M). GLNIX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNIX (0.54) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNIX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNIX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNIX (0) vs RSEBX (250). GLNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.29 vs. RSEBX (2.82). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.61 vs. RSEBX (14.68).
| GLNIX | RSEBX | GLNIX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.45 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.955 | 7.035 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.1M | 77.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.23 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.29 | 2.82 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.62 | 31.94 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.61 | 14.68 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.62 | 36.85 | 162% |