Ad is loading...
GLNIX vs SFCWX
GLNIX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNIX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$22.81
Change+$0.43 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.28M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$65.07
Change+$1.14 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.94B
GLNIX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNIX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNIX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 67.9B vs. GLNIX (68.3M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: SFCWX (1.04) vs GLNIX (0.60). GLNIX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNIX (13 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNIX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.68 vs. SFCWX (-1.46). SFCWX (30.56) and GLNIX (30.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNIX | SFCWX | GLNIX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.65 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.590 | -5.518 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 67.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.04 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.68 | -1.46 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.31 | 2.37 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.43 | 30.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers