Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNIX vs SFCWX
GLNIX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNIX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$25.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.12M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$76.33
Change-$0.55 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.76B
GLNIX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNIX vs. SFCWX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNIX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNIX (72.1M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNIX (0.55). GLNIX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNIX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNIX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. GLNIX (6.96). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.16 vs. SFCWX (15.16).
| GLNIX | SFCWX | GLNIX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.65 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.370 | 10.867 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.1M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.94 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 8.96 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.96 | 32.91 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.16 | 15.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement