Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs RSEBX
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.36M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.88
Change+$0.69 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNLX (72.4M). GLNLX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNLX (0.35) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNLX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNLX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNLX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. GLNLX (8.33). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.35 vs. RSEBX (14.22).
| GLNLX | RSEBX | GLNLX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.45 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.512 | 10.573 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.4M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.23 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 11.05 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.30 | 34.12 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.35 | 14.22 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.91 | 53.50 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement