Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs RSEBX
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.02M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.11
Change-$0.17 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. RSEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNLX (72M). GLNLX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNLX (0.36) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNLX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNLX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNLX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. GLNLX (8.66). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.33 vs. RSEBX (12.50).
| GLNLX | RSEBX | GLNLX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.45 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.835 | 9.389 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.23 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | 9.79 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.84 | 20.18 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.33 | 12.50 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.14 | 44.85 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement