Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$23.61
Change-$0.35 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.24M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$71.32
Change-$1.13 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.67B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 76.7B vs. GLNLX (75.2M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (0.96) vs GLNLX (0.36). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.64 vs. SFCWX (5.16). GLNLX (25.27) and SFCWX (24.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.591 | 3.557 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2M | 76.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.96 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 5.16 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.60 | 31.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.27 | 24.19 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement