Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.36M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$77.09
Change+$0.55 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNLX (72.4M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (0.91) vs GLNLX (0.35). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.77 vs. GLNLX (8.33). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 20.00 vs. GLNLX (17.35).
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.512 | 11.971 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.4M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 12.77 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.30 | 37.96 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.35 | 20.00 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement