Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.02M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.68
Change-$0.18 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNLX (72M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNLX (0.36). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.67 vs. GLNLX (8.66). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 17.32 vs. GLNLX (15.33).
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.835 | 9.923 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.94 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | 10.67 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.84 | 22.71 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.33 | 17.32 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement