Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.33
Change-$0.21 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.81M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.37
Change-$0.79 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.5B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 78.5B vs. GLNLX (75.8M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNLX (0.35). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. SFCWX (7.48). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.85 vs. SFCWX (20.70).
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.842 | 8.021 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.8M | 78.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.94 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 7.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.92 | 35.88 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.85 | 20.70 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement