Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNMX vs RSEBX
GLNMX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNMX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R4
Price$24.80
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.17
Change-$0.48 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.9B
GLNMX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNMX vs. RSEBX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNMX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. GLNMX (70.4M). GLNMX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNMX (0.56) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNMX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNMX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNMX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNMX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. GLNMX (5.94). GLNMX return over 5 years is better than : 10.02 vs. RSEBX (7.21).
| GLNMX | RSEBX | GLNMX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.45 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.215 | 11.019 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.23 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 8.45 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.60 | 41.52 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.02 | 7.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.82 | 55.11 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement