Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPAX vs SMFPX
GLPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. SMFPX (1.25B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: GLPAX (7.14) vs SMFPX (3.42). GLPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). GLPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.58 vs. GLPAX (7.89). GLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 218.75 vs. SMFPX (164.55).
| GLPAX | SMFPX | GLPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 2.12 | 330% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 2.15 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.408 | 3.685 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.25B | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.14 | 3.42 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 12.58 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.63 | 57.25 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 218.75 | 164.55 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.12 | 62.71 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement