Ad is loading...
GLPAX vs SMFPX
GLPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. SMFPX (1.21B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: GLPAX (6.61) vs SMFPX (4.75). GLPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. SMFPX (91.00). GLPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.13 vs. GLPAX (29.37). GLPAX (77.41) and SMFPX (74.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLPAX | SMFPX | GLPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.049 | 31.123 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 1.21B | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 4.75 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.37 | 32.13 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.24 | 76.61 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.41 | 74.84 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.57 | 18.54 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...