Ad is loading...
GLPAX vs SMFPX
GLPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. SMFPX (1.24B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: GLPAX (6.55) vs SMFPX (3.39). GLPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). GLPAX (2.44) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.13). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). GLPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.48 vs. GLPAX (19.79). GLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 209.11 vs. SMFPX (165.31).
| GLPAX | SMFPX | GLPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.13 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.13 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.311 | -1.222 | -271% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 1.24B | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.55 | 3.39 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.79 | 27.48 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.20 | 56.68 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 209.11 | 165.31 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.98 | 24.21 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...