Ad is loading...
GLPAX vs SMFPX
GLPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. SMFPX (1.23B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: GLPAX (7.09) vs SMFPX (3.64). GLPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). GLPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.08 vs. GLPAX (11.95). GLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 182.43 vs. SMFPX (149.25).
| GLPAX | SMFPX | GLPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 2.12 | 330% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 2.15 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.493 | -1.026 | -48% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.23B | 132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.09 | 3.64 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | 18.08 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.03 | 56.78 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.43 | 149.25 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.85 | 16.90 | 117% |