Ad is loading...
GLPAX vs SMFPX
GLPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. SMFPX (1.22B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: GLPAX (6.60) vs SMFPX (3.38). GLPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). GLPAX (2.44) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.13). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). GLPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.27 vs. GLPAX (15.29). GLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 224.08 vs. SMFPX (170.32).
| GLPAX | SMFPX | GLPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.13 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.13 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.352 | -2.596 | 14% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.22B | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.60 | 3.38 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | 22.27 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.03 | 42.17 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 224.08 | 170.32 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.55 | 12.51 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...