Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPAX vs SMFPX
GLPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. SMFPX (1.26B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: GLPAX (6.93) vs SMFPX (3.39). GLPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). GLPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. GLPAX (8.94). GLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 199.73 vs. SMFPX (150.52).
| GLPAX | SMFPX | GLPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 2.12 | 330% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 2.15 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.542 | 2.104 | 121% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 1.26B | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.93 | 3.39 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 15.70 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.81 | 74.70 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 199.73 | 150.52 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.51 | 31.11 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement