Ad is loading...
GLPIX vs PRPAX
GLPIX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a StrongBuy and PRPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. PRPAX (503M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPAX (56.38) vs GLPIX (6.76). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: GLPIX (12 years) vs PRPAX (11 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPAX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPAX (1000). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.91 vs. GLPIX (12.23). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 186.37 vs. PRPAX (158.07).
| GLPIX | PRPAX | GLPIX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.46 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.51 | 446% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.604 | 0.119 | 506% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 503M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.76 | 56.38 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.23 | 16.91 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.29 | 51.28 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.37 | 158.07 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.04 | 29.69 | 78% |