Ad is loading...
GLPIX vs PRPAX
GLPIX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. PRPAX (544M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPAX (52.96) vs GLPIX (6.29). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: GLPIX (12 years) vs PRPAX (11 years). GLPIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPAX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPAX (1000). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.77 vs. GLPIX (21.17). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 323.53 vs. PRPAX (256.28).
| GLPIX | PRPAX | GLPIX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.46 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.51 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.863 | 7.542 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 544M | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 52.96 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.17 | 24.77 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.27 | 55.11 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 323.53 | 256.28 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.55 | 42.53 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...