Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPAX
GLPIX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PRPAX (477M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPAX (54.44) vs GLPIX (7.02). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPAX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPAX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. PRPAX (-0.60). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 187.89 vs. PRPAX (153.17).
| GLPIX | PRPAX | GLPIX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.46 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.51 | 446% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.011 | 5.080 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 477M | 333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.02 | 54.44 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | -0.60 | -327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.52 | 50.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 187.89 | 153.17 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.96 | 102.15 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement