Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPAX
GLPIX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.64B vs. PRPAX (508M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPAX (52.43) vs GLPIX (6.79). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: GLPIX (12 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPAX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPAX (1000). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.26 vs. GLPIX (11.17). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 219.75 vs. PRPAX (169.72).
| GLPIX | PRPAX | GLPIX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.46 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.51 | 446% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.568 | 4.690 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 508M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 52.43 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 14.26 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.66 | 53.93 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.75 | 169.72 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.91 | 64.85 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement