Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPZX
GLPIX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPZX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. PRPZX (512M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPZX (49.29) vs GLPIX (6.54). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: GLPIX (12 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). GLPIX (0) and PRPZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.96 vs. GLPIX (12.56). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 186.62 vs. PRPZX (157.40).
| GLPIX | PRPZX | GLPIX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.488 | 6.399 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 512M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.54 | 49.29 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 17.96 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.00 | 52.78 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.62 | 157.40 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.02 | 63.20 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement