Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPZX
GLPIX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPZX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PRPZX (475M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPZX (51.10) vs GLPIX (7.02). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). GLPIX (0) and PRPZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.25 vs. PRPZX (-2.40). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 187.66 vs. PRPZX (157.05).
| GLPIX | PRPZX | GLPIX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.928 | 5.183 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 475M | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.02 | 51.10 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.25 | -2.40 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.48 | 49.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 187.66 | 157.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.68 | 105.18 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers