Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Buy and SMAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.64B vs. SMAPX (1.24B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (6.54) vs SMAPX (4.09). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (12 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (74.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. GLPIX (12.00). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 207.25 vs. SMAPX (155.72).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.37 | 492% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.40 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.324 | 3.638 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 1.24B | 132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.54 | 4.09 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.00 | 16.07 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.36 | 52.83 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 207.25 | 155.72 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.45 | 63.43 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement