Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. SMAPX (1.24B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (7.02) vs SMAPX (4.27). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (13 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (74.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.96 vs. SMAPX (0.71). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 187.89 vs. SMAPX (153.22).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.37 | 492% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.40 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.011 | 3.926 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 1.24B | 128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.02 | 4.27 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 0.71 | 276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.52 | 55.56 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 187.89 | 153.22 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.96 | 111.30 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement