Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. SMAPX (1.26B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (6.60) vs SMAPX (4.08). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (12 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (74.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.71 vs. GLPIX (9.20). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 203.73 vs. SMAPX (160.02).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.37 | 492% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.40 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.695 | 2.561 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 1.26B | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.60 | 4.08 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 16.71 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.18 | 78.90 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.73 | 160.02 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.89 | 41.68 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement