Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Buy and SMAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. SMAPX (1.29B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (6.79) vs SMAPX (4.13). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (13 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (74.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.97 vs. GLPIX (11.19). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 252.97 vs. SMAPX (200.24).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.37 | 492% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.40 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.791 | 7.033 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 1.29B | 127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 4.13 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.19 | 17.97 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.14 | 87.12 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 252.97 | 200.24 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.93 | 118.70 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement