Ad is loading...
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a StrongBuy and SMAPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. SMAPX (1.22B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (6.29) vs SMAPX (4.02). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (12 years) vs SMAPX (12 years). GLPIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (74.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. GLPIX (13.23). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 211.00 vs. SMAPX (171.62).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.40 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.40 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.309 | -2.217 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.22B | 134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 4.02 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.23 | 19.88 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.79 | 49.73 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 211.00 | 171.62 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.73 | 20.93 | 99% |