Ad is loading...
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. SMAPX (1.35B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (6.29) vs SMAPX (4.02). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (12 years) vs SMAPX (12 years). GLPIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (74.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.86 vs. GLPIX (21.17). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 323.53 vs. SMAPX (259.70).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.40 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.40 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.863 | 8.050 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 1.35B | 132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 4.02 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.17 | 31.86 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.27 | 62.92 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 323.53 | 259.70 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.55 | 39.22 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...