Ad is loading...
GLRBX vs HBLCX
GLRBX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts GLRBX vs HBLCX
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow R
Price$21.29
Change-$0.33 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.98M
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$13.67
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.39B
GLRBX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLRBX vs. HBLCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLRBX is a Buy and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. GLRBX (388M). HBLCX pays higher dividends than GLRBX: HBLCX (2.64) vs GLRBX (1.21). GLRBX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: GLRBX (34 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than GLRBX (1.23). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GLRBX (26.00). GLRBX (2000) and HBLCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to GLRBX: HBLCX (2000) vs GLRBX (500). GLRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.03 vs. HBLCX (1.28). GLRBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.06 vs. HBLCX (12.19).
| GLRBX | HBLCX | GLRBX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.64 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.64 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.435 | -0.464 | 525% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 388M | 11.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 2.64 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | 1.28 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.45 | 0.01 | 77,747% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.06 | 12.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.86 | 21.04 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers