GLU | PBD | GLU / PBD | |
Gain YTD | 15.928 | 3.037 | 524% |
Net Assets | 101M | 69.1M | 146% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.75 | 183% |
Turnover | 4.00 | 52.00 | 8% |
Yield | 1.02 | 2.70 | 38% |
Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
GLU | PBD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 7 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 7 days ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago89% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago90% | 10 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago76% | 8 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLU and AES have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLU and AES's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBD has been closely correlated with BLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBD jumps, then BLDP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PBD | 100% | -0.96% | ||
BLDP - PBD | 73% Closely correlated | -5.76% | ||
CSIQ - PBD | 70% Closely correlated | -3.93% | ||
AMRC - PBD | 68% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
RUN - PBD | 67% Closely correlated | -7.63% | ||
ORA - PBD | 66% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More |