GLUC
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
GRBMF
Price
$2.68
Change
-$0.27 (-9.15%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

GLUC vs GRBMF

Header iconGLUC vs GRBMF Comparison
Open Charts GLUC vs GRBMFBanner chart's image
Glucose Health
Price$0.13
Change-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Volume$6.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.68
Change-$0.27 (-9.15%)
Volume$10.2K
CapitalizationN/A
GLUC vs GRBMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLUC vs. GRBMF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLUC is a Hold and GRBMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GLUC: $0.13 vs. GRBMF: $2.68)
Brand notoriety: GLUC and GRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLUC: 67% vs. GRBMF: 225%
Market capitalization -- GLUC: $647.71K vs. GRBMF: $23.09B
GLUC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $647.71K. GRBMF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $23.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLUC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRBMF is a better buy in the long-term than GLUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLUC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLUC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRBMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLUC is a better buy in the short-term than GRBMF.

Price Growth

GLUC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while GRBMF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLUC is expected to report earnings on Jan 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.68% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRBMF($23.1B) has a higher market cap than GLUC($648K). GRBMF YTD gains are higher at: -45.661 vs. GLUC (-53.161). GRBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.7B vs. GLUC (-32.45K). GRBMF has more cash in the bank: 7.19B vs. GLUC (29.3K). GLUC has less debt than GRBMF: GLUC (431K) vs GRBMF (120B). GRBMF has higher revenues than GLUC: GRBMF (408B) vs GLUC (88.1K).
GLUCGRBMFGLUC / GRBMF
Capitalization648K23.1B0%
EBITDA-32.45K71.7B-0%
Gain YTD-53.161-45.661116%
P/E RatioN/A12.17-
Revenue88.1K408B0%
Total Cash29.3K7.19B0%
Total Debt431K120B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLUC vs GRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
GLUC
GRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
572
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9970
SMR RATING
1..100
10061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8780
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
420
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRBMF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (57). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (99). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLUC (100). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Price Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (87). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLUC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as GRBMF (20). This means that GLUC’s stock grew similarly to GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLUCGRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIGVX23.140.02
+0.09%
Thornburg International Growth R3
OCLGX13.94-0.04
-0.29%
Optimum Large Cap Growth C
MIGFX46.98-0.14
-0.30%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk A
RYCUX39.77-0.15
-0.38%
Rydex Utilities C
CFGRX53.04-0.21
-0.39%
Commerce Growth

GLUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLUC and ZHYBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLUC and ZHYBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLUC
1D Price
Change %
GLUC100%
-18.03%
ZHYBF - GLUC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUZOF - GLUC
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
GLAPY - GLUC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPDNF - GLUC
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
GRBMF - GLUC
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.15%
More

GRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRBMF and BMBOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRBMF and BMBOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRBMF
1D Price
Change %
GRBMF100%
-9.15%
BMBOY - GRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
GLUC - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-18.03%
GCHOY - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GRBMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More