GLUC
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.66M
GRBMF
Price
$3.07
Change
+$0.07 (+2.33%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLUC vs GRBMF

Header iconGLUC vs GRBMF Comparison
Open Charts GLUC vs GRBMFBanner chart's image
Glucose Health
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$525
Capitalization1.66M
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$3.07
Change+$0.07 (+2.33%)
Volume$200
Capitalization14.1B
GLUC vs GRBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLUC vs. GRBMF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLUC is a Hold and GRBMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLUC: $0.10 vs. GRBMF: $3.07)
Brand notoriety: GLUC and GRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLUC: 7% vs. GRBMF: 11%
Market capitalization -- GLUC: $1.66M vs. GRBMF: $14.1B
GLUC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.66M. GRBMF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLUC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLUC and GRBMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLUC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLUC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GLUC and GRBMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GLUC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while GRBMF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +895.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRBMF($14.1B) has a higher market cap than GLUC($1.66M). GRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 18.464 vs. GLUC (-20.667). GRBMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.1B vs. GLUC (-32.45K). GRBMF has more cash in the bank: 8.12B vs. GLUC (46.2K). GLUC has less debt than GRBMF: GLUC (431K) vs GRBMF (193B). GRBMF has higher revenues than GLUC: GRBMF (427B) vs GLUC (88.1K).
GLUCGRBMFGLUC / GRBMF
Capitalization1.66M14.1B0%
EBITDA-32.45K58.1B-0%
Gain YTD-20.66718.464-112%
P/E RatioN/A21.35-
Revenue88.1K427B0%
Total Cash46.2K8.12B0%
Total Debt431K193B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLUC vs GRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
GLUC
GRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
10070
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
461
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRBMF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (55). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (100). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (100). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (64). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLUC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRBMF (61). This means that GLUC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLUCGRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOD10.521.97
+23.04%
Kodiak Sciences
LOOP1.860.18
+10.71%
Loop Industries
NNNN47.850.21
+0.44%
Anbio Biotechnology
SJM112.510.17
+0.15%
JM Smucker Company (The)
AGMH1.76-0.11
-5.88%
AGM Group Holdings Inc

GLUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLUC and ZHYBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLUC and ZHYBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLUC
1D Price
Change %
GLUC100%
+1.17%
ZHYBF - GLUC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUZOF - GLUC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GLUC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPDNF - GLUC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GLUC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRBMF and BMBOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRBMF and BMBOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRBMF
1D Price
Change %
GRBMF100%
N/A
BMBOY - GRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLUC - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
GPAGF - GRBMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GRBMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GRBMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More