GLW
Price
$69.17
Change
+$1.92 (+2.86%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.74B
68 days until earnings call
SANM
Price
$119.23
Change
+$2.29 (+1.96%)
Updated
Aug 28, 03:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.14B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLW vs SANM

Header iconGLW vs SANM Comparison
Open Charts GLW vs SANMBanner chart's image
Corning
Price$69.17
Change+$1.92 (+2.86%)
Volume$716
Capitalization57.74B
Sanmina
Price$119.23
Change+$2.29 (+1.96%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6.14B
GLW vs SANM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLW vs. SANM commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLW is a StrongBuy and SANM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GLW: $67.25 vs. SANM: $116.95)
Brand notoriety: GLW: Notable vs. SANM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLW: 90% vs. SANM: 103%
Market capitalization -- GLW: $57.74B vs. SANM: $6.14B
GLW [@Electronic Components] is valued at $57.74B. SANM’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $134.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $7.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SANM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SANM is a better buy in the long-term than GLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SANM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLW is a better buy in the short-term than SANM.

Price Growth

GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а +4.10% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was +6.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

SANM is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+3.08% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($57.7B) has a higher market cap than SANM($6.14B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than SANM: GLW (71.54) vs SANM (25.04). SANM YTD gains are higher at: 54.553 vs. GLW (43.135). GLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. SANM (494M). GLW has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. SANM (798M). SANM has less debt than GLW: SANM (305M) vs GLW (8.5B). GLW has higher revenues than SANM: GLW (14.2B) vs SANM (8.05B).
GLWSANMGLW / SANM
Capitalization57.7B6.14B940%
EBITDA2.83B494M573%
Gain YTD43.13554.55379%
P/E Ratio71.5425.04286%
Revenue14.2B8.05B176%
Total Cash1.49B798M187%
Total Debt8.5B305M2,787%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLW vs SANM: Fundamental Ratings
GLW
SANM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2783
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
146
SMR RATING
1..100
7765
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLW's Valuation (19) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANM (65). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (14). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's SMR Rating (65) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (77). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANM (39). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (69). This means that SANM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLWSANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFA90.660.28
+0.31%
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF
GUNR42.750.10
+0.23%
FlexShares Mstar Glbl Upstrm Nat Res ETF
CPNJ26.440.02
+0.07%
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jun
MCN6.27N/A
N/A
Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund
MUSQ29.42-0.03
-0.10%
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
-0.22%
FLEX - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
APH - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
SANM - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
CLS - GLW
66%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
TEL - GLW
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More