GM
Price
$50.97
Change
-$0.87 (-1.68%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
52.35B
10 days until earnings call
MBGAF
Price
$56.53
Change
-$0.27 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
85.66B
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GM vs MBGAF

Header iconGM vs MBGAF Comparison
Open Charts GM vs MBGAFBanner chart's image
General Motors
Price$50.97
Change-$0.87 (-1.68%)
Volume$9.62M
Capitalization52.35B
Mercedes Benz Group AG
Price$56.53
Change-$0.27 (-0.48%)
Volume$28.45K
Capitalization85.66B
GM vs MBGAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GM vs. MBGAF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GM is a Hold and MBGAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GM: $50.97 vs. MBGAF: $56.53)
Brand notoriety: GM: Notable vs. MBGAF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GM: 88% vs. MBGAF: 58%
Market capitalization -- GM: $52.35B vs. MBGAF: $85.66B
GM [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $52.35B. MBGAF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $85.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $33.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBGAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBGAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GM is a better buy in the long-term than MBGAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBGAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MBGAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBGAF is a better buy in the short-term than GM.

Price Growth

GM (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +2.25% price change this week, while MBGAF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

GM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

MBGAF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-0.93% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBGAF($85.7B) has a higher market cap than GM($52.4B). GM has higher P/E ratio than MBGAF: GM (6.20) vs MBGAF (4.90). MBGAF YTD gains are higher at: 2.280 vs. GM (-4.318). MBGAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28.3B vs. GM (23.2B). GM (26.5B) and MBGAF (25.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MBGAF has less debt than GM: MBGAF (84.1B) vs GM (123B). GM has higher revenues than MBGAF: GM (172B) vs MBGAF (154B).
GMMBGAFGM / MBGAF
Capitalization52.4B85.7B61%
EBITDA23.2B28.3B82%
Gain YTD-4.3182.280-189%
P/E Ratio6.204.90126%
Revenue172B154B112%
Total Cash26.5B25.5B104%
Total Debt123B84.1B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GM vs MBGAF: Fundamental Ratings
GM
MBGAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
723
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5967
SMR RATING
1..100
5663
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4565
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBGAF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GM (89) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that MBGAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GM’s over the last 12 months.

GM's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MBGAF (67) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

GM's SMR Rating (56) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MBGAF (63) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

GM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MBGAF (61) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

GM's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MBGAF (65) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMMBGAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBGAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISTIX73.750.85
+1.17%
Macquarie Science and Technology I
JISCX23.220.12
+0.52%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value S
ALMAX14.41N/A
N/A
Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth A
AMGOX20.99N/A
N/A
Alger Mid Cap Growth I-2
RYCNX45.03-0.01
-0.02%
Rydex Transportation C

MBGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBGAF has been closely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBGAF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBGAF
1D Price
Change %
MBGAF100%
-0.48%
MBGYY - MBGAF
96%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
VWAPY - MBGAF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
VWAGY - MBGAF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
POAHY - MBGAF
69%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
STLA - MBGAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.55%
More