GMBL vs LNW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMBL is a Sell and LNW is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMBL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GMBL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LNW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
GMBL (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while LNW (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -9.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMBL is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2023.
LNW is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-2.70% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| GMBL | LNW | GMBL / LNW | |
| Capitalization | 1.68M | 9.08B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -25.74M | 898M | -3% |
| Gain YTD | -93.198 | 13.555 | -688% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.01 | 57.73 | 0% |
| Revenue | 16.1M | 2.9B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 303K | 425M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 70.4K | 3.93B | 0% |
GMBL | LNW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GMBL's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNW (77) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GMBL’s stock grew significantly faster than LNW’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMBL (100) in the null industry. This means that LNW’s stock grew significantly faster than GMBL’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's SMR Rating (28) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMBL (100) in the null industry. This means that LNW’s stock grew significantly faster than GMBL’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMBL (92) in the null industry. This means that LNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMBL’s over the last 12 months.
LNW's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GMBL (100) in the null industry. This means that LNW’s stock grew similarly to GMBL’s over the last 12 months.
| LNW | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GYLD | 13.07 | N/A | -0.04% |
| Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | |||
| BJUL | 44.34 | -0.35 | -0.78% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF July | |||
| XLP | 79.96 | -0.71 | -0.88% |
| The Consumer Staples Sel SectSPDR® ETF | |||
| CATH | 71.24 | -0.77 | -1.07% |
| Global X S&P 500® Catholic Values ETF | |||
| ISRA | 40.30 | -0.60 | -1.47% |
| VanEck Israel ETF | |||
GMBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMBL and IGT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMBL and IGT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMBL | 100% | -20.97% | ||
| IGT - GMBL | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| PENN - GMBL | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| GDEN - GMBL | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| BYD - GMBL | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
| LNW - GMBL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
More | ||||
LNW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNW has been closely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNW jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNW | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| BYD - LNW | 76% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| PENN - LNW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CNTY - LNW | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| ACEL - LNW | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| CZR - LNW | 35% Loosely correlated | -5.00% | ||
More | ||||