Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs MCDFX
GMEPX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$28.11
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.26M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.13
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
GMEPX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMEPX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMEPX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. GMEPX (39.3M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: MCDFX (2.90) vs GMEPX (1.25). GMEPX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GMEPX (7 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GMEPX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). GMEPX (53.06) and MCDFX (52.20) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.31 vs. GMEPX (-20.64).
| GMEPX | MCDFX | GMEPX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.845 | 30.786 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.3M | 99.4M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.06 | 52.20 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.47 | 26.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.64 | 1.31 | -1,571% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement