Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs TRCLX
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$28.11
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.26M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.72
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.25M
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.3M vs. GMEPX (39.3M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: TRCLX (1.39) vs GMEPX (1.25). GMEPX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GMEPX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GMEPX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GMEPX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.06 vs. TRCLX (47.81). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.47 vs. GMEPX (-20.64).
| GMEPX | TRCLX | GMEPX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.845 | 29.924 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.3M | 61.3M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.06 | 47.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.47 | 20.27 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.64 | 1.47 | -1,406% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement