Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs TRCLX
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$26.54
Change+$0.59 (+2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.81M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.30
Change+$0.20 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.07M
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 58.1M vs. GMEPX (36.8M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: TRCLX (1.56) vs GMEPX (1.36). GMEPX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GMEPX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GMEPX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GMEPX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GMEPX (39.28) and TRCLX (39.07) have marching annual gain over last year. TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.78 vs. GMEPX (-27.40).
| GMEPX | TRCLX | GMEPX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.637 | 24.053 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.8M | 58.1M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.28 | 39.07 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.24 | 11.56 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.40 | -3.78 | 725% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement