Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs TRCLX
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$24.45
Change-$0.05 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.09M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.86
Change-$0.09 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.83M
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 49.8M vs. GMEPX (35.1M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: TRCLX (1.61) vs GMEPX (1.37). GMEPX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GMEPX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GMEPX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GMEPX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.91 vs. TRCLX (14.89). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. GMEPX (-30.88).
| GMEPX | TRCLX | GMEPX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.548 | 12.311 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 49.8M | 70% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.61 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.91 | 14.89 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.10 | -2.26 | 314% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.88 | -7.51 | 411% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement