Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs TRCLX
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$29.77
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.46M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.09
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.15M
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMEPX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMEPX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.2M vs. GMEPX (42.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: TRCLX (1.34) vs GMEPX (1.14). GMEPX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GMEPX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GMEPX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GMEPX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.68 vs. TRCLX (17.01). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.20 vs. GMEPX (-18.33).
| GMEPX | TRCLX | GMEPX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.690 | 33.428 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.5M | 66.2M | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.68 | 17.01 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 30.44 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.33 | 4.20 | -436% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement