Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs TRCLX
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$24.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.48M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.32
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.97M
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 44M vs. GMEPX (34.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: TRCLX (1.71) vs GMEPX (1.48). GMEPX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GMEPX (7 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GMEPX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GMEPX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.10 vs. TRCLX (2.62). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 5.43 vs. GMEPX (-11.76).
| GMEPX | TRCLX | GMEPX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.705 | 7.481 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.5M | 44M | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.71 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 2.62 | 690% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.34 | 1.40 | -96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.76 | 5.43 | -216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement