Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMET vs LIT
GMET vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs LIT
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$22.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.36K
Net Assets18.33M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$37.22
Change+$0.06 (+0.16%)
Volume$173.16K
Net Assets810.69M
GMET vs LIT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. LIT commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a Buy and LIT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 811M vs. GMET (18.3M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: GMET (9.566) vs LIT (-8.730). GMET was incepted earlier than LIT: GMET (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| GMET | LIT | GMET / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.566 | -8.730 | -110% |
| Net Assets | 18.3M | 811M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.75 | 81% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 22.87 | 87% |
| Yield | 1.83 | 1.04 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LIT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MP - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| SCCO - GMET | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.42% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | +4.53% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y