Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMET vs LIT
GMET vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs LIT
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$33.27
Change+$0.66 (+2.02%)
Volume$219
Net Assets25.8M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$59.38
Change+$0.62 (+1.06%)
Volume$411
Net Assets1.33B
GMET vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. LIT commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a Hold and LIT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.33B vs. GMET (25.8M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: GMET (56.553) vs LIT (44.602). GMET was incepted earlier than LIT: GMET (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| GMET | LIT | GMET / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 56.553 | 44.602 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 25.8M | 1.33B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.75 | 81% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 22.87 | 87% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 0.47 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMET | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 90% | 29 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SQM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.63% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | +14.71% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||