9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
GMET vs SQM
GMET vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs SQM
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$21.53
Change-$0.56 (-2.54%)
Volume$1.24K
Net Assets17.79M
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$39.67
Change-$0.14 (-0.35%)
Volume$684.09K
Capitalization13.99B
GMET vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. SQM commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a Buy and SQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SQM: Fundamental Ratings
SQM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMET | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| MP - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | +4.83% | ||
| SCCO - GMET | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.02% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||
SQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQM | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| ALB - SQM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| ALTM - SQM | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| SXYAY - SQM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| BASFY - SQM | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| AKZOY - SQM | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||