Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMF vs MINV
GMF vs MINV Comparison
Open Charts GMF vs MINV
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$136.07
Change-$1.90 (-1.38%)
Volume$200
Net Assets380.41M
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Price$34.46
Change-$0.66 (-1.88%)
Volume$1.12K
Net Assets74.76M
GMF vs MINV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMF vs. MINV commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMF is a Hold and MINV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMF has more net assets: 380M vs. MINV (74.8M). MINV has a higher annual dividend yield than GMF: MINV (25.384) vs GMF (18.587). GMF was incepted earlier than MINV: GMF (19 years) vs MINV (3 years). GMF (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than MINV (0.79). MINV has a higher turnover GMF (5.00) vs GMF (5.00).
| GMF | MINV | GMF / MINV | |
| Gain YTD | 18.587 | 25.384 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 380M | 74.8M | 508% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.79 | 62% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 268.33 | 2% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.18 | 950% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMF | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMF | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| TSM - GMF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| BZ - GMF | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| JD - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| BIDU - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| ATHM - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||
MINV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MINV has been loosely correlated with DIDIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MINV jumps, then DIDIY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINV | 100% | -2.18% | ||
| DIDIY - MINV | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| AMAT - MINV | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.15% | ||
| PDD - MINV | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.31% | ||
| ALGM - MINV | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| MELI - MINV | 5% Poorly correlated | -8.54% | ||
More | ||||