GMHLF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
134.55M
HALFF
Price
$165.38
Change
+$1.88 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.08B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMHLF vs HALFF

Header iconGMHLF vs HALFF Comparison
Open Charts GMHLF vs HALFFBanner chart's image
Gam Holding AG
Price$0.09
Change+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Volume$65.45K
Capitalization134.55M
Hal Trust
Price$165.38
Change+$1.88 (+1.15%)
Volume$1
Capitalization15.08B
GMHLF vs HALFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMHLF vs. HALFF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMHLF is a Hold and HALFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GMHLF: $0.09 vs. HALFF: $165.38)
Brand notoriety: GMHLF and HALFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMHLF: 100% vs. HALFF: 0%
Market capitalization -- GMHLF: $134.55M vs. HALFF: $15.08B
GMHLF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $134.55M. HALFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $15.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMHLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHALFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HALFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HALFF is a better buy in the long-term than GMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HALFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HALFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GMHLF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HALFF (@Investment Managers) price change was +11.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HALFF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than GMHLF($135M). GMHLF YTD gains are higher at: 41.667 vs. HALFF (39.272). HALFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.95B vs. GMHLF (-57.9M). HALFF has more cash in the bank: 4.32B vs. GMHLF (42.7M). GMHLF has less debt than HALFF: GMHLF (16.5M) vs HALFF (5.01B). HALFF has higher revenues than GMHLF: HALFF (12.5B) vs GMHLF (98.3M).
GMHLFHALFFGMHLF / HALFF
Capitalization135M15.1B1%
EBITDA-57.9M2.95B-2%
Gain YTD41.66739.272106%
P/E RatioN/A7.44-
Revenue98.3M12.5B1%
Total Cash42.7M4.32B1%
Total Debt16.5M5.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMHLF vs HALFF: Fundamental Ratings
GMHLF
HALFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4540
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9686
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4475

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HALFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMHLF (89). This means that HALFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMHLF (100). This means that HALFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (99). This means that HALFF’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMHLF (79). This means that HALFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

HALFF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as GMHLF (96). This means that HALFF’s stock grew similarly to GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMHLFHALFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HALFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCL54.521.64
+3.10%
T-Rex 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF
FTBD49.960.29
+0.58%
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
VLUE120.420.43
+0.36%
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
GCC20.62-0.06
-0.29%
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Stgy Fd
USSG59.07-0.46
-0.78%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF

GMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMHLF and SVCTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMHLF and SVCTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMHLF
1D Price
Change %
GMHLF100%
N/A
SVCTF - GMHLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBY - GMHLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - GMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GMHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
GLAE - GMHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HALFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HALFF and IVSBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HALFF and IVSBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HALFF
1D Price
Change %
HALFF100%
+1.15%
IVSBF - HALFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
CG - HALFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
TROW - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
BUR - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
SEIC - HALFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More