Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMNPX vs MLPRX
GMNPX vs MLPRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMNPX vs. MLPRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMNPX is a Hold and MLPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPRX has more cash in the bank: 3.9B vs. GMNPX (1.59B). MLPRX pays higher dividends than GMNPX: MLPRX (9.71) vs GMNPX (6.80). GMNPX was incepted earlier than MLPRX: GMNPX (8 years) vs MLPRX (14 years). MLPRX (9.77) is less costly to investors than GMNPX (6.62). GMNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. MLPRX (11.00). GMNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLPRX: GMNPX (0) vs MLPRX (1000). MLPRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. GMNPX (2.47). MLPRX (188.46) and GMNPX (186.70) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GMNPX | MLPRX | GMNPX / MLPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.62 | 9.77 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.62 | 9.77 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.002 | 6.155 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 3.9B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.80 | 9.71 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.47 | 6.71 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.93 | 55.09 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.70 | 188.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers