GMS vs NRTZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a Buy and NRTZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNRTZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NRTZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GMS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GMS (@Building Products) experienced а +1.80% price change this week, while NRTZF (@Building Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+0.85% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| GMS | NRTZF | GMS / NRTZF | |
| Capitalization | 3.88B | 568M | 683% |
| EBITDA | 593M | 9.67B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 23.377 | 7.177 | 326% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.67 | 12.29 | 111% |
| Revenue | 5.39B | 222B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 88.3M | 37.8B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.23B | 4.45B | 28% |
GMS | NRTZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 9 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NRTZF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMS (63) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for NRTZF (100) in the null industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than NRTZF’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's SMR Rating (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NRTZF (88) in the null industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NRTZF’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as NRTZF (55) in the null industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to NRTZF’s over the last 12 months.
NRTZF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GMS (13) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that NRTZF’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
| GMS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% |
GMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been closely correlated with BECN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BECN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMS | 100% | +2.62% | ||
| BECN - GMS | 76% Closely correlated | +3.32% | ||
| BXC - GMS | 69% Closely correlated | +3.38% | ||
| OC - GMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| FBIN - GMS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| BLDR - GMS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
More | ||||
NRTZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NRTZF and OC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRTZF and OC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NRTZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRTZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OC - NRTZF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| GMS - NRTZF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.62% | ||
| FBIN - NRTZF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
| BLDR - NRTZF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
| NIABY - NRTZF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||