Advertisement
GMS vs XPEL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a StrongBuy and XPEL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXPEL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- XPEL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPEL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- XPEL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GMS (@Building Products) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while XPEL (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMS is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.
XPEL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-1.24% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.87% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| GMS | XPEL | GMS / XPEL | |
| Capitalization | 4.2B | 972M | 432% |
| EBITDA | 428M | 73.8M | 580% |
| Gain YTD | 29.636 | -12.093 | -245% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.81 | 19.95 | 210% |
| Revenue | 5.51B | 449M | 1,228% |
| Total Cash | 55.6M | 49.6M | 112% |
| Total Debt | 1.6B | 21.8M | 7,330% |
GMS | XPEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GMS's Valuation (72) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as XPEL (75) in the null industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to XPEL’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPEL (82) in the null industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPEL’s over the last 12 months.
XPEL's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMS (76) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that XPEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as XPEL (51) in the null industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to XPEL’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for XPEL (73) in the null industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than XPEL’s over the last 12 months.
| GMS | XPEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 22 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
GMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been closely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMS | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| BXC - GMS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| IR - GMS | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| BLDR - GMS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| CODYY - GMS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| OC - GMS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
XPEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPEL has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPEL jumps, then VC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XPEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPEL | 100% | -3.21% | ||
| VC - XPEL | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| THRM - XPEL | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| ADNT - XPEL | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| LEA - XPEL | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| FOXF - XPEL | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||