GMVHF
Price
$9.48
Change
-$1.07 (-10.14%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
MGM
Price
$33.77
Change
-$1.60 (-4.52%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
55 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GMVHF vs MGM

Header iconGMVHF vs MGM Comparison
Open Charts GMVHF vs MGMBanner chart's image
ENTAIN
Price$9.48
Change-$1.07 (-10.14%)
Volume$858
CapitalizationN/A
MGM Resorts International
Price$33.77
Change-$1.60 (-4.52%)
Volume$45.51K
CapitalizationN/A
GMVHF vs MGM Comparison Chart
Loading...
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMVHF vs. MGM commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMVHF is a StrongBuy and MGM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GMVHF: $9.48 vs. MGM: $35.37)
Brand notoriety: GMVHF: Not notable vs. MGM: Notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMVHF: 13% vs. MGM: 97%
Market capitalization -- GMVHF: $11.38B vs. MGM: $14.97B
GMVHF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $11.38B. MGM’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $14.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMVHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GMVHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GMVHF and MGM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMVHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMVHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MGM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GMVHF and MGM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GMVHF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -6.71% price change this week, while MGM (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

MGM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.96% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGM($15B) has a higher market cap than GMVHF($11.4B). GMVHF has higher P/E ratio than MGM: GMVHF (222.22) vs MGM (14.98). MGM YTD gains are higher at: -20.837 vs. GMVHF (-23.868). MGM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.75B vs. GMVHF (547M). MGM has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. GMVHF (606M). GMVHF has less debt than MGM: GMVHF (3.4B) vs MGM (31.6B). MGM has higher revenues than GMVHF: MGM (16.2B) vs GMVHF (4.3B).
GMVHFMGMGMVHF / MGM
Capitalization11.4B15B76%
EBITDA547M2.75B20%
Gain YTD-23.868-20.837115%
P/E Ratio222.2214.981,484%
Revenue4.3B16.2B27%
Total Cash606M2.93B21%
Total Debt3.4B31.6B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMVHF vs MGM: Fundamental Ratings
GMVHF
MGM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8353
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
9838
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGM's Valuation (70) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GMVHF (87) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GMVHF (100) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's SMR Rating (38) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMVHF (98) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMVHF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MGM (62) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GMVHF’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.

GMVHF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGM (79) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GMVHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMVHFMGM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GMVHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAHC22.34-0.30
-1.33%
Phibro Animal Health Corp
DCI70.92-0.99
-1.38%
Donaldson Company
ENR35.92-0.75
-2.05%
Energizer Holdings
XNET2.07-0.09
-4.17%
Xunlei Limited
LGMK1.60-0.10
-5.88%
LogicMark Inc

GMVHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMVHF has been loosely correlated with GMVHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMVHF jumps, then GMVHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVHF
1D Price
Change %
GMVHF100%
N/A
GMVHY - GMVHF
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
MGM - GMVHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
BYD - GMVHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
WYNN - GMVHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
EVVTY - GMVHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More