GNNSF
Price
$1.25
Change
-$0.01 (-0.79%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
HNSBF
Price
$2.83
Change
-$0.82 (-22.47%)
Updated
Dec 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

GNNSF vs HNSBF

Header iconGNNSF vs HNSBF Comparison
Open Charts GNNSF vs HNSBFBanner chart's image
Genscript Biotech
Price$1.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.79%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Hansa Medical AB
Price$2.83
Change-$0.82 (-22.47%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
GNNSF vs HNSBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GNNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GNNSF vs. HNSBF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNNSF is a Sell and HNSBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GNNSF: $1.25 vs. HNSBF: $2.83)
Brand notoriety: GNNSF and HNSBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GNNSF: 14% vs. HNSBF: 325%
Market capitalization -- GNNSF: $2.74B vs. HNSBF: $169.74M
GNNSF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $2.74B. HNSBF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $169.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $482.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GNNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHNSBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GNNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HNSBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNNSF is a better buy in the long-term than HNSBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GNNSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNSBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GNNSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HNSBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNNSF is a better buy in the short-term than HNSBF.

Price Growth

GNNSF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HNSBF (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -7.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-7.11% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNNSF($2.74B) has a higher market cap than HNSBF($170M). HNSBF YTD gains are higher at: 25.388 vs. GNNSF (-48.770). GNNSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -203.82M vs. HNSBF (-559.05M). GNNSF has more cash in the bank: 1.87B vs. HNSBF (554M). GNNSF has less debt than HNSBF: GNNSF (448M) vs HNSBF (959M). GNNSF has higher revenues than HNSBF: GNNSF (1.01B) vs HNSBF (189M).
GNNSFHNSBFGNNSF / HNSBF
Capitalization2.74B170M1,610%
EBITDA-203.82M-559.05M36%
Gain YTD-48.77025.388-192%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.01B189M534%
Total Cash1.87B554M338%
Total Debt448M959M47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNNSF vs HNSBF: Fundamental Ratings
GNNSF
HNSBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8994
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HNSBF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GNNSF (94). This means that HNSBF’s stock grew similarly to GNNSF’s over the last 12 months.

HNSBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GNNSF (100). This means that HNSBF’s stock grew similarly to GNNSF’s over the last 12 months.

GNNSF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HNSBF (100). This means that GNNSF’s stock grew similarly to HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

GNNSF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as HNSBF (79). This means that GNNSF’s stock grew similarly to HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

GNNSF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNSBF (100). This means that GNNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNSBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GNNSFHNSBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GNNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEMCX9.01-0.04
-0.44%
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets C
MFRJX59.28-0.32
-0.54%
MFS Research R4
FAMVX108.30-0.92
-0.84%
FAM Value Investor
AATIX20.98-0.25
-1.18%
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap I
SCAVX15.19-0.21
-1.36%
AB Small Cap Value A

GNNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNNSF and ORYZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNNSF and ORYZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNNSF
1D Price
Change %
GNNSF100%
N/A
ORYZF - GNNSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.92%
ARGNF - GNNSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLDI - GNNSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
PRLD - GNNSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
HNSBF - GNNSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HNSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HNSBF has been loosely correlated with ENSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HNSBF jumps, then ENSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNSBF
1D Price
Change %
HNSBF100%
N/A
ENSC - HNSBF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
CVAC - HNSBF
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
MLLCF - HNSBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALLK - HNSBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
GNPX - HNSBF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
More