Ad is loading...
GNR vs ICOP
GNR vs ICOP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs ICOP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$49.09
Change-$2.93 (-5.63%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Price$25.53
Change-$1.16 (-4.35%)
Volume$2.87K
CapitalizationN/A
GNR vs ICOP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. ICOP commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Hold and ICOP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.75B vs. ICOP (30.6M). ICOP has a higher annual dividend yield than GNR: ICOP (5.732) vs GNR (-6.629). GNR was incepted earlier than ICOP: GNR (14 years) vs ICOP (1 year). ICOP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | ICOP | GNR / ICOP | |
| Gain YTD | -6.629 | 5.732 | -116% |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 30.6M | 8,990% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 31.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 3.30 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 82% | 20 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
ICOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOP has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOP jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOP | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| FCX - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| SCCO - ICOP | 88% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| HBM - ICOP | 84% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| ERO - ICOP | 79% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| BHP - ICOP | 74% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||