GNR | NIKL | GNR / NIKL | |
Gain YTD | 17.957 | 24.507 | 73% |
Net Assets | 3.28B | 10.5M | 31,267% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.75 | 53% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 47.00 | 32% |
Yield | 3.66 | 2.91 | 126% |
Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
GNR | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that NIKL and LZM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIKL and LZM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NIKL | 100% | +2.47% | ||
LZM - NIKL | 32% Poorly correlated | +9.52% | ||
NICE - NIKL | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
NIC - NIKL | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
RDN - NIKL | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
CTM - NIKL | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |