It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GNS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHHEGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GNS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HHEGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
GNS (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +4.43% price change this week, while HHEGF (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.39%.
GNS is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.
‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
GNS | HHEGF | GNS / HHEGF | |
Capitalization | 88.5M | 30.3M | 292% |
EBITDA | 221K | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 47.826 | -94.995 | -50% |
P/E Ratio | 0.25 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 23.1M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 7.75M | N/A | - |
GNS | HHEGF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 5 days ago13% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago33% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago37% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago54% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GNS and BCO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNS and BCO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GNS | 100% | +8.51% | ||
BCO - GNS | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
SUGP - GNS | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RTO - GNS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
FEDU - GNS | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
APEI - GNS | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.29% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HHEGF has been loosely correlated with BSEFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HHEGF jumps, then BSEFY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HHEGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HHEGF | 100% | N/A | ||
BSEFY - HHEGF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
TRI - HHEGF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
SSHT - HHEGF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GNS - HHEGF | 4% Poorly correlated | +8.51% | ||
DCMDF - HHEGF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.83% | ||
More |