GNZUF
Price
$0.48
Change
+$0.06 (+14.29%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
9.35B
GWLLF
Price
$2.17
Change
-$0.06 (-2.69%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
27.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GNZUF vs GWLLF

Header iconGNZUF vs GWLLF Comparison
Open Charts GNZUF vs GWLLFBanner chart's image
Guangzhou Automobile Group
Price$0.48
Change+$0.06 (+14.29%)
Volume$150
Capitalization9.35B
Great Wall Motor
Price$2.17
Change-$0.06 (-2.69%)
Volume$380
Capitalization27.86B
GNZUF vs GWLLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GNZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GNZUF vs. GWLLF commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNZUF is a StrongBuy and GWLLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (GNZUF: $0.48 vs. GWLLF: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: GNZUF and GWLLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GNZUF: 3% vs. GWLLF: 8%
Market capitalization -- GNZUF: $9.35B vs. GWLLF: $27.86B
GNZUF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $9.35B. GWLLF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $27.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.1T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $36.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GNZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGWLLF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GNZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GWLLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLF is a better buy in the long-term than GNZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GNZUF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GWLLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GNZUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GWLLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GNZUF and GWLLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GNZUF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +11.03% price change this week, while GWLLF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +9.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +3.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+3.59% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWLLF($27.9B) has a higher market cap than GNZUF($9.35B). GNZUF has higher P/E ratio than GWLLF: GNZUF (33.21) vs GWLLF (10.48). GWLLF YTD gains are higher at: 22.535 vs. GNZUF (11.098). GWLLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.3B vs. GNZUF (-2.41B). GNZUF has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. GWLLF (37.8B). GNZUF has less debt than GWLLF: GNZUF (26.7B) vs GWLLF (58.4B). GWLLF has higher revenues than GNZUF: GWLLF (192B) vs GNZUF (106B).
GNZUFGWLLFGNZUF / GWLLF
Capitalization9.35B27.9B34%
EBITDA-2.41B24.3B-10%
Gain YTD11.09822.53549%
P/E Ratio33.2110.48317%
Revenue106B192B55%
Total Cash40.4B37.8B107%
Total Debt26.7B58.4B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNZUF vs GWLLF: Fundamental Ratings
GNZUF
GWLLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
595
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
9124
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
323
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GWLLF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (32). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (100). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLF's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNZUF (91). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (47). This means that GWLLF’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GNZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLF (23). This means that GNZUF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GNZUFGWLLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GNZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPAY33.691.06
+3.26%
iShares FinTech Active ETF
MARU26.530.31
+1.19%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncMarETF
BSCU16.850.09
+0.54%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corp Bd ETF
FIBR89.150.42
+0.47%
iShares U.S. Fixed Inc Bal Rsk Sysmc ETF
HPF16.190.03
+0.19%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II

GNZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNZUF and FUJHY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNZUF and FUJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNZUF
1D Price
Change %
GNZUF100%
+14.88%
FUJHY - GNZUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
GWLLY - GNZUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
GWLLF - GNZUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJHF - GNZUF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GELYY - GNZUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GWLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLF and XPNGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLF and XPNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWLLF
1D Price
Change %
GWLLF100%
N/A
XPNGF - GWLLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
XPEV - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.40%
LI - GWLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
FUJHF - GWLLF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNZUF - GWLLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+14.88%
More