GOMRF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.25M
RKMSF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
9.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOMRF vs RKMSF

Header iconGOMRF vs RKMSF Comparison
Open Charts GOMRF vs RKMSFBanner chart's image
Geomega Resources
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$44.31K
Capitalization19.25M
Rokmaster Resources
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization9.85M
GOMRF vs RKMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GOMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RKMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOMRF vs. RKMSF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOMRF is a StrongBuy and RKMSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GOMRF: $0.14 vs. RKMSF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: GOMRF and RKMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOMRF: 224% vs. RKMSF: 142%
Market capitalization -- GOMRF: $19.25M vs. RKMSF: $9.85M
GOMRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $19.25M. RKMSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOMRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRKMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GOMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RKMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GOMRF and RKMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOMRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RKMSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOMRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RKMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOMRF is a better buy in the short-term than RKMSF.

Price Growth

GOMRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +18.77% price change this week, while RKMSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOMRF($19.3M) has a higher market cap than RKMSF($9.85M). GOMRF YTD gains are higher at: 140.000 vs. RKMSF (94.316). GOMRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.17M vs. RKMSF (-5.73M). GOMRF has more cash in the bank: 4.22M vs. RKMSF (357K). RKMSF has less debt than GOMRF: RKMSF (212K) vs GOMRF (702K). GOMRF has higher revenues than RKMSF: GOMRF (453K) vs RKMSF (0).
GOMRFRKMSFGOMRF / RKMSF
Capitalization19.3M9.85M196%
EBITDA-1.17M-5.73M20%
Gain YTD140.00094.316148%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue453K0-
Total Cash4.22M357K1,182%
Total Debt702K212K331%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOMRF vs RKMSF: Fundamental Ratings
GOMRF
RKMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8433
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RKMSF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOMRF (100). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew significantly faster than GOMRF’s over the last 12 months.

GOMRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (100). This means that GOMRF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

GOMRF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (100). This means that GOMRF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

GOMRF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (35). This means that GOMRF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

GOMRF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RKMSF (100). This means that GOMRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOMRFRKMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RKMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBIO15.890.35
+2.22%
Crescent Biopharma Inc
KEN43.780.64
+1.48%
KENON HOLDINGS Ltd
BFAM120.58-0.34
-0.28%
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
LFWD0.67N/A
-0.40%
Lifeward Ltd
PEP135.38-1.10
-0.81%
PepsiCo

GOMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GOMRF and RKMSF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GOMRF and RKMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOMRF
1D Price
Change %
GOMRF100%
+7.24%
RKMSF - GOMRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLNCY - GOMRF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
GLBXF - GOMRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
GMBXF - GOMRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
GDLNF - GOMRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-17.25%
More