It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GOOGL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GOOGL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
GOOGL (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +1.21% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +12.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.64%.
GOOGL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
GOOGL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GOOGL | LTL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FLN | 17.66 | 0.14 | +0.80% |
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
SCHM | 28.12 | 0.16 | +0.57% |
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™ | |||
PID | 19.64 | 0.08 | +0.41% |
Invesco International Div Achiev ETF | |||
QINT | 51.38 | 0.09 | +0.17% |
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF | |||
LABD | 5.79 | -0.05 | -0.86% |
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTL has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTL jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LTL | 100% | +1.02% | ||
GOOGL - LTL | 75% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
MTCH - LTL | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
PARA - LTL | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
GOOG - LTL | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
CLFD - LTL | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
More |